Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sent from my iPhone Steve Barbour On Mar 23, 2015, at 3:03 AM, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote: I have never heard of photographers considering their work by the acreage of film they use rather than the number of worthwhile results they get. Is this common? Good question, I am familiar with the idea..."it"s not what you shoot, it"s what you show" and the usual tendency of photographers to underestimate the number of frames they exposed,,, s > On 21 Mar, 2015, at 20:14, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > > A dozen sheets of 8x10 equal 144 shots with a Rolleiflex or Hasselblad. > 432 shots with in 35mm. Also par for the course. A very common occurrence. > > I shot 10 rolls a pro pack of Delta 100 of one model once in a few hours. > So I had 360 chances to get it right. > That was the most concentrated I ever got. > My Balcars afterwards were quite warm. But they cooled down in time. > I needed a cold shower for sure. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information