Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Love the LUG just for what you just wrote Henning - humanity!!! Thanks Brian too :-) Amities Philippe Le 9 mars 15 ? 22:47, Henning Wulff a ?crit : > Philippe, I certainly don't mind. I agree that this shot should > probably have a bit more done with it. Part of the problem is that I > have a whole lot of shots, and some just need a while sitting in > front of me before I can really 'see' them. With this one I knew > when I shot it that it was worthwhile taking it, but it certainly > wasn't 'finished' in camera. For one thing, it needs different > cropping. > > Have at it; and certainly no hard feelings. In this regard I have > quite a thick skin, and there are few shots where another view isn't > helpful in shaping my take on it. I may or may not like your > interpretation, but again, that's just a personal thing. If 98% of > people like your interpretation better than mine; great for the 98%, > but I might still prefer mine and I'll post that. However, most > often I'll get new insight into a photo and incorporate that into a > new interpretation. > > Henning > > > On 2015-03-09, at 2:18 PM, "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> > wrote: > >> Hi Henning, no hard feeling nor intended harm meant >> >> What I mean is there's a great potential here - what it is lacking >> is some kind of vision as expressed earlier today or was it >> yesterday in answer to Ted's question about another image. >> >> LR is warming up while I'm typing this and I'll try to "interpret" >> your shot in the Philippe's way ... whatever it means. >> >> In truth, I think your take has strong potential, but no actual >> personality - my usually grief against so many images posted here ... >> >> I'll be back in a short while with my own vision of the shot - it >> might please or not - but it will certainly have intented >> character, which most of the LUG's postings currenctly lack >> >> Hope this is more helping than destructive. >> >> Amities >> Philippe, a LUGger at heart >> >> >> >> Le 9 mars 15 ? 21:57, Henning Wulff a ?crit : >> >>> Go ahead, say what you really mean. I'm bracing myself. I can take >>> it :-). >>> >>> Henning >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2015-03-09, at 1:42 PM, "philippe.amard" >>> <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> This one shot should really deserve some attention and VERY >>>> careful post treatment >>>> >>>> I might love it, really :-) >>>> >>>> Amities >>>> Philippe >>>> >>>> Le 9 mars 15 ? 20:55, Henning Wulff a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hwulff/trips/Cuba+2015/A1307962.jpg.html >>>> >>>> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is >>>> invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince. >>>> NO ARCHIVE >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >>>> information >>>> >>> >>> >>> Henning Wulff >>> henningw at archiphoto.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is >> invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince. >> NO ARCHIVE >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > Henning Wulff > henningw at archiphoto.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince. NO ARCHIVE