Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Aram, There is shutter lag, but it is super fast. They use an electronic first curtain shutter (EFCS). Much faster than the way the Leica focal plane shutter works with the EVF. Bob Sent from my iPad > On Feb 11, 2014, at 4:37 PM, Aram Langhans <leica_r8 at hotmail.com> wrote: > > Bob. Why is there no shutter lag on the Fuji or Sony? Are you talking > with native lenses or with non-native (Leica?) lenses? > > Aram > > -----Original Message----- From: Steve Barbour > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 12:38 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] I can focus my Noctilux > > > > Sent from my iPhone > Steve Barbour > > On Feb 11, 2014, at 12:22 PM, "rgacpa at gmail.com" <rgacpa at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Steve, > So hard to do this right by email. > > Especially on a phone. Til later when I am at my computer... > > Thanks, steve > > Thanks for your patience with my difficulties in trying to explain. > > I just use the old rangefinder on the M when taking portraits (of Leo > mostly!). Where the iris meets the white of the eye I try to get in focus, > usually by getting close and moving my head slightly and pushing the > button when I see an expression. So it's not "focus peaking" of course > through the Optical View Finder (OVF); just normal M focusing. > > I think I have a better chance that way than with the EVF as I tried to > explain earlier. With the EVF I find I need to magnify to 5X, which only > shows the very center of the image; so I have to put the eye in the > center. Once I see the focus peaking I depress the shutter half way which > takes me back to a full frame view in the EVF. Then I have to reframe > (because I've put the eyes in the center to focus peak with the EVF and > rarely is that what I want in the exposure). Then I press the shutter and > there is a shutter lag as, unlike the Fuji and Sony, the shutter has to > first close and then fire. > > So with all that time needed with the EVF, I find the OVF to be better FOR > ME... As I said before, with landscapes, the EVF is wonderful; like in > your image of the glasses!! > > Hope I'm making more sense? > Thanks, > Bob > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Feb 11, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 7:57 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Three issues I'm having with the Leica M + EVF and my Nocti: >>> >>> 1. I have to magnify the EVF image to see the eyes get "peaked" >>> 2. Once peaked, reframing after depressing the shutter halfway is >>> needed as the M only magnifies the center of the image. >>> 3. There is a delay between depressing the shutter and the sensor being >>> exposed with the EVF (be design unfortunately!). >>> >>> So I find it hard to use the EVF on people. Easier to just move my head >>> forward and backward with the optical range finder and get nearly >>> instant exposure when pressing the shutter button. Hit rate seems >>> better for me. >>> Non moving objects are just the opposite. >>> Just my experience. >> >> >> let me see if I can speak to this now?been thinking about it on & off for >> hours. >> >> can you see ?the eyes get peaked? without the EVF, if so how ? >> >> if this is a necessity, how do you do it without the EVF? >> >> >> s >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Which is a really interesting topic for me because all else being >>>>> equal I >>>>> find that the RF is much more precise. >>>> >>>> >>>> more precise than what Geoff ? >>>> have you given an adequate trial to focus peaking? >>>> >>>>> That is to say that in my experience >>>> >>>> what is your experience with focus peaking? >>>> >>>>> there is a range of acceptable focus peaking effect as you move the >>>>> focus >>>>> ring (not dissimilar to a plain ground glass in effect?) but only one >>>>> moment when the RF is truly aligned.However that is not taking into >>>>> account >>>>> focus shift which the EVF negates for you. >>>> >>>> so you 1. see better what you are focussing on 2. have a separate >>>> confirmation of focus 3. avoid focus shift (a biggie when you are wide >>>> open) 4. benefit from focus peaking for long lenses as you mention below >>>> >>>>> Of course the RF is not very >>>>> good at all if you want to use R lenses or long teles, or macros or >>>>> third >>>>> party adapted lenses! >>>> >>>> >>>> so what's not to like? >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Geoff >>>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 11 February 2014 08:40, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 2:17 PM, rgacpa at gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Whoop! >>>>>>> Did you try it with just the range finder? >>>>>> >>>>>> MUCH less certain >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> s >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at >>>>>>>> gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at >>>>>>>>> gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> finally, at f1... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/PAW+2014/glasses.jpg.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> focussed near lateral RIGHT rim, on RIGHT earpiece, 1/2 inch from >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>> rim... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Leica M 240 with Noctilux at f1, RAW file done with focus peaking, >>>>>> using Olympus VF-2.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> many thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information