Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]David you are mistaken. You were not the only one who shot totally non-Leica. Perhaps you missed my earlier posts on the content of the current yearbook. I counted 110 photos that were identified as taken with any Leica Camera or any Leica branded lens on any camera. (including Panasonic made lenses that say Leica on the front) There are 70 photos in there that were identified as taken with Nikon, Fujifilm, Canon and other brands., There are 59 photos in there where the equipment was not identified for whatever reason the photographers wish. Including your gear detail has always been optional. No problem for anyone as far as I know. The next one might have 200 iPhone photos and 2 with Leica if that's what people want to contribute. It's your book. The editors don't decide the content at all. I really don't understand these new comments, except perhaps they reflect that there is differing opinion on the place for Leica within the LUG. Once again I said from the start that I did not intend to change what Jim has long established for 2014. But maybe some part of that is what people are unhappy about? Well I'll check back in after some weeks on this after everyone has had further opportunities to have a say. Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 12 January 2014 18:20, David Ching <davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg> wrote: > Dear Peter, > > Count me guilty of using both non-Leica body and non-Leica lenses photos > for the 2013. > > It doesn't mean that: > > 1. I have abandoned Leica. (Still a Leica diehard.) > 2. Shots are better in non-Leica gear. > > The photos I submitted were the ones I thought most appropriate for my > personal specific photo feature this year: Candid Portraits. > > Those produced by my non-Leica bodies with dedicated lenses best > complemented each other thus producing the photos I was seeking for. > Unfortunately those by Leica weren't. No reflection on Leica gear, just did > not produce any with either my Leica M or R lenses and Leica bodies. > > Naturally I would have loved to use the M240 which I booked when it was > first launched. However the retail price of the equivalent of USD8400 here > in Asia is way too rich for me. And the results of Leica glass on my Sony > A7R which seems a good compromise, can only be used for next year's > yearbook if at all. > > Jim was open to non-Leica gear. Geoff seems much less so (I stand > corrected). No issues, I'd either take the challenge or change my intended > photos to be featured. > > Am waiting for my YearBook to arrive and would be interesting to know if I > am the only one who shot totally non-Leica. You? > > Still a Leicaphile, > > David Ching > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >