Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]According to the lens designer, the S lenses are capable of out-resolving the current and next generation sensor (30x45mm) in that system. All of these theoretical numbers depend on ideal test conditions of course. Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 23 October 2013 06:23, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > I think 24MP on APS-C is the highest pixel density on decent sized > sensors? I think that works out as 54MP on a FF sensor... > > john > ________________________________________ > > > I guess I'm also asking about pixel density limits (eg per cm2) without > regard to sensor size. > > -Lew Schwartz > On Oct 22, 2013 3:07 PM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > > > I think there will be a limit on what is useful to fit on a 24mm x 36mm > > sensor. 36MP already means that diffraction starts about f9, lenses need > to > > be very good (why Zeiss and Nikon are releasing new more expensive > lenses) > > and technique needs to be very good to get the best out. I have seen a > > couple of people claim that the 24MP M and Sony RX1 give better > (sharper?) > > results than the D800E. > > > > Finally who needs more MP on a 'small' sensor? 24MP upwards will make a > > decent sized print, if you are often making very large prints then, as in > > the film days, a larger sensor will be the way to go.... > > > > john > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > Anyone know if there's a limit to the mp count for a full frame sensor? > > 36 > > > for the new A7R is very impressive. Are there any gotcha's re image > > quality > > > vs count, ie is there a count above which quality won't improve? > > > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >