Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Auto ISO
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:32:47 -0400
References: <D081BEA2-0FD5-4700-95E9-F125B060C7E1@acm.org> <6E5A84A7-5426-43DA-BDC7-0405091126AC@gmail.com>

Depends on your kind of photography. Now I admit that when we travel not
all I shoot is 'high art' ;-) We often move between inside and out, shade
and sun quite quickly, and it is in those changing conditions where Auto
ISO can be useful. Its not the best way to choose an exposure. Neither is
aperture priority or any 'auto' system, but it has its place when the
light is changing rapidly. Before I used it I would find myself shooting
1000 ISO in sunshine, having forgotten to change the setting between the
museum and the best outside street shot I would ever have taken ;-)

Cheers

Alastair

> I think I'm the only naysayer on this, but I would never use auto ISO.  It
> makes no sense to me!
>
> Leo Wesson
> www.leowesson.com
>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 23:30, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> I thought a few words about how this function operates on Leica, at
>> least on the M9, might be useful to y'all, since the Leica Manual is not
>> the clearest on this subject.
>>
>> Let's start with an understanding of the relationship between the three
>> parameters: ISO, f-number, and shutter speed. We are used to thinking of
>> exposure having one degree of freedom for a correct exposure. That is
>> because we are used, from years of experience with film, of thinking of
>> ISO being a constant. You can't change ISO in the middle of a roll of
>> film. So, for any situation, there is one degree of freedom for a
>> "correct" exposure: you change shutter speed, you have to change
>> aperture, and vice versa. Hence, for the little all-electronic cameras
>> where both the aperture and shutter are under computer control, you can
>> choose the aperture (aperture preferred), or you can chose the shutter
>> speed (shutter speed preferred) and the camera choses the one you didn't
>> chose. You all know this; I'm just being pedantic.  Oh, then these idiot
>> cameras have "programmed" mode where the camera chooses both based on
>> some arcane set of rules. That's for bozos.
>>
>> Now, lets look at the Leica. The camera can control the shutter, but it
>> can't control the aperture. So the only automatic mode would appear to
>> be aperture preferred. Ah, but the ISO is under the control of the
>> camera's computer. It is now a third variable: it can be changed at any
>> time. So, Leica in its wisdom invented Auto ISO. Now we have two degrees
>> of freedom. That is, we can pick the values of any two: say ISO and
>> aperture, and now the shutter speed is determined. Thus, on the Leica,
>> we now have a way of doing shutter speed preferred: set the shutter to
>> the speed you want, set the aperture to the f-number you want, and the
>> camera will pick an ISO that gives the correct exposure. So, what
>> happens if you set Auto ISO and aperture preferred on the M9? You will
>> be in s situation similar to program mode in a point and shoot. The
>> camera will chose both the shutter speed and the ISO value. I took a few
>> shots at three consecutive stops on the dial, and the shutter speed sat
>> at
>   1
>> /150, perhaps not what I would want with a 90mm.
>>
>> If you set a shutter speed and an f stop with Auto ISO, everything works
>> fine as long as the ISO that gives "correct" exposure is in the
>> available ISO range. And you can use exposure compensation. What you
>> lose is any information about exposure in the viewfinder. What
>> information could that be? The ISO the camera selects, of course.
>>
>> One warning: the little dot and triangles used for manual exposure
>> setting seem to be meaningless with Auto ISO: just ignore them.
>>
>> Herbert Kanner
>> kanner at acm.org
>> 650-326-8204
>>
>> Question authority and the authorities will question you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>




Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Auto ISO)
In reply to: Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] Auto ISO)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leowesson) ([Leica] Auto ISO)