Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/07/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:49:37 -0400
References: <D36BE3BF-BD20-4F7A-8831-E90FD4BA59E4@yahoo.com.sg> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C5725915@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <8A8F001C-730F-4071-B309-D18C45692B34@mac.com> <BLU173-DS15D658E6FD82AEC0EE54BAB87D0@phx.gbl> <BLU0-SMTP247CB7D841CA118B44B5638C7D0@phx.gbl>
I just lifted both the R9 with DMR and the Canon 1DMII and the Canon is
heavier.
Tina
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Yep, that's what did me in. The weight, for the functionality.
>
> Sure, a Tech Master kit is heavier, but, a Tech Master provides a 4x5
> negative.
>
> But, when a DMR listed for sale, I am still tempted to look.
>
> ...Vick
>
>
> On 05/07/2013 4:21 PM, Aram Langhans wrote:
>
>> I would have gone DMR except for one thing - the weight. .....
>>
>> Aram
>>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
> more information
>
>
--
Tina Manley
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
Replies:
Reply from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
In reply to:
Message from davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg (David Ching) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)