Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/07/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:44:53 -0400
References: <D36BE3BF-BD20-4F7A-8831-E90FD4BA59E4@yahoo.com.sg><80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C5725915@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <8A8F001C-730F-4071-B309-D18C45692B34@mac.com> <BLU173-DS15D658E6FD82AEC0EE54BAB87D0@phx.gbl>
Yep, that's what did me in. The weight, for the functionality.
Sure, a Tech Master kit is heavier, but, a Tech Master provides a 4x5
negative.
But, when a DMR listed for sale, I am still tempted to look.
...Vick
On 05/07/2013 4:21 PM, Aram Langhans wrote:
> I would have gone DMR except for one thing - the weight. .....
>
> Aram
Replies:
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
In reply to:
Message from davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg (David Ching) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] DMR versus Canon plus R lenses)