Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:39:03 +1000
References: <CAE3QcF4ekKeHwqo8vgwQUpJmm71SWYZNSH38F7CMY_3Y_KeRAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CDEF83C3.C211%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Mark I could be considered biased here ;-)
However just suggesting what may work best for Ric whose apparently now
facing a large repair bill for a previously repaired M8.  Personally I
would be very frustrated in his position and very reluctant to spend more
on the M8. I would maybe also be elevating my protest if the repair agency
has said no to a warranty claim. Everyone's circumstance is different and
their own of course. My understanding of that shutter problem was that the
slower max speed ones ought to be better. The shutter unit is in any case a
standard Copal unit that has been in many many camera for years including I
think R cameras and the M9 too. I know nothing on any MTBF histories though.
For what it's worth the excellent Fuji cameras are back ordered everywhere
here as well... But you can pick up almost any M lens or a Monochrom or an
M-E or an X anything or even a Dlux jeans edition right off a shelf. You
would wait longer for an M though...but my wait is over ;-)
 On Jun 26, 2013 7:28 AM, "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> Geoff you seem to be suggesting that someone on the LUG go out and buy a
> Leica camera. I can't even belive what I am reading. You are way off topic.
> This is the Fuji only zone.
> Here today gone tomorrow cameras only.
>
>
> On 6/25/13 5:16 PM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I can only speak about the international warranty Ric where that is the
> > case. I don't know the circumstances of the failure you got nor what was
> > done of course. A camera that goes to Solms at least is assessed
> completely
> > when any paid service is performed and any additional work would be
> quoted
> > and everything adjusted to spec and guaranteed. For the M9 at least at
> one
> > point you could buy an additional warranty period too.
> >
> >
> > *Family and friends are everything.*
> >
> > Cheers
> > Geoff
> > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> >
> >
> > On 25 June 2013 21:32, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:
> >
> >> would that were true--my other M8 died less than a year after Leica CLA.
> >>
> >> They refused to talk about repaair because they said they had not
> replaced
> >> the shutter.
> >>
> >> ric
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 25, 2013, at 5:27 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Pay for a CLA and then get twelve months warranty on the whole camera
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)