Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued -Steve
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:26:56 -0700
References: <CDCCE6B6.A6F8%mark@rabinergroup.com> <6B040171-D07C-49C9-BFF4-DF5FEF38FBA5@sfr.fr> <7E4BD08B-4970-40D4-A4D5-8BF8DF503E69@gmail.com> <6DD7AC10-1097-4C30-95CA-F8EDC5EDFC7D@sfr.fr>

On May 30, 2013, at 10:14 AM, "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> 
wrote:

> 
> Le 30 mai 13 ? 18:55, Steve Barbour a ?crit :
> 
>> 
>> On May 30, 2013, at 9:51 AM, "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> What if the new Leica mini is the Leica version of GoogleGlasses?
>>> You'd wear them strolling downtown, a child would be there, you'd smile 
>>> seeing its youth and energy.
>>> In the meantime, the mother sees the red dot on the branches of the 
>>> camera,
>>> and you're in for the dock.
>>> 
>>> Sherlock Bresson
>> 
>> 
>> aka   Hank Carter
>> 
> this one?
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4e700oABl4

no,

this one....

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/hankcarter.jpg.html


Steve


> let Tikwa out before clicking, safer ...
> ;-)
> Ph
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 30 mai 13 ? 17:21, Mark Rabiner a ?crit :
>>> 
>>>> Absolutely! Just use the word "child" or "baby" and our rights fly 
>>>> right out
>>>> the picture window!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 5/30/13 10:44 AM, "Lottermoser George" <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On May 30, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is about a woman who recognized her kid in the picture, and worried
>>>>>> about her baby.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yet - I've not seen this "recognizable child" photograph; and I've 
>>>>> looked.
>>>>> Have you (or anyone else) seen the "offending photograph?"
>>>>> Just curious about this particular point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>> Photography
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to 
>>> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
>>> NO ARCHIVE
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to 
> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
> NO ARCHIVE
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] a photographer sued -Steve)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] a photographer sued -Steve)