Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued -Steve
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 19:14:46 +0200
References: <CDCCE6B6.A6F8%mark@rabinergroup.com> <6B040171-D07C-49C9-BFF4-DF5FEF38FBA5@sfr.fr> <7E4BD08B-4970-40D4-A4D5-8BF8DF503E69@gmail.com>

Le 30 mai 13 ? 18:55, Steve Barbour a ?crit :

>
> On May 30, 2013, at 9:51 AM, "philippe.amard"  
> <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote:
>
>> What if the new Leica mini is the Leica version of GoogleGlasses?
>> You'd wear them strolling downtown, a child would be there, you'd  
>> smile seeing its youth and energy.
>> In the meantime, the mother sees the red dot on the branches of the  
>> camera,
>> and you're in for the dock.
>>
>> Sherlock Bresson
>
>
> aka   Hank Carter
>
this one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4e700oABl4
let Tikwa out before clicking, safer ...
;-)
Ph


>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 30 mai 13 ? 17:21, Mark Rabiner a ?crit :
>>
>>> Absolutely! Just use the word "child" or "baby" and our rights fly  
>>> right out
>>> the picture window!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/30/13 10:44 AM, "Lottermoser George" <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 30, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is about a woman who recognized her kid in the picture, and  
>>>>> worried
>>>>> about her baby.
>>>>
>>>> Yet - I've not seen this "recognizable child" photograph; and  
>>>> I've looked.
>>>> Have you (or anyone else) seen the "offending photograph?"
>>>> Just curious about this particular point.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>> Photography
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is  
>> invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
>> NO ARCHIVE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE






Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] a photographer sued -Steve)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] a photographer sued)