Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]mine has to go in, i am really upset. we had the same thing with the m8s On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com>wrote: > Thanks, Mehrdad. I regularly check eyelet attachment and such, but will > check with Leica on this. > > In the 70's, when the M4-2 came out, I got one and also a new 35 > Summicron. On a hike in the mountains, the eyelet came out, and the camera > and lens smashed down on rocks with multiple impacts. Leica replaced both > immediately. > > About 10 years later I had a similar experience with a Nikon FM and an > 85/2. Because I couldn't find all the paperwork for the 85, Nikon refused > to repair/replace it. The FM only got replaced immediately because I was an > NPS member. > > Henning > > > > On 2013-04-24, at 8:46 PM, mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com> wrote: > > > seems there r some production problems with the m that is now fixed but > > some warnings for current owners. i already contacted leica via email > > > > > > here is the info > > > http://leicarumors.com/2013/04/24/precautionary-check-for-all-leica-m-type-240-cameras-delivered-before-april-5-2013.aspx/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LeicaRumors+%28LeicaRumors.com%29 > > > > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------- > > regards, mehrdad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > Henning Wulff > henningw at archiphoto.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- ------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad