Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I didn't mean to be entirely humorous. How long was the exposure? I find modern emulsions don't suffer from as much reciprocity failure as those of 15-20yrs ago. Sheet films, in my experience, need about .5 to 1 stop more exposure and somewhat more development than you might expect, plus a fairly active developer. Another factor in all this might be that the T-MAX films don't have the same silver content as the more traditional emulsions. -Lew Schwartz On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote: > Is that Richard Nixon? > -Lew Schwartz > > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Richard Man <richard at > richardmanphoto.com>wrote: > >> Sadly, somewhat a bust since I forgot that TMax-100 has reciprocity >> factor! >> (too used to the Acros-100 in that sense) >> >> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20130323-Scanned-67.jpg >> >> Underexposed by at least a stop but LR does half a decent job of rescuing >> it. >> >> I have one that uses the Scheimpflug and sadly it's too underexposed to >> save. The Scheimpflug does seem to work fine though in getting unparallel >> plane of focus. >> >> (I know the development is fine as I was developing 12 sheets for another >> person in exchange for 6 holders and they came out fine). >> >> -- >> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > >