Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I bought a 28mm lens back in the 80s when everybody was banging on about it being the "new35" and so forth. To me it is neither one thing or the other. I -do- use wides, but not for people. My 28mm is my least used Leica lens. FD >________________________________ > From: Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013, 11:00 >Subject: Re: [Leica] Shanghai market part 2 > >Its clear that just because a certain shooting style is popular among a >consensus of working PJs / street shooters at a certain time in this case >now would not? mean there's a law says you have to just exactly as they do. >A person could decide they're going to etch out a style with a long lens and >ignore it all have a distinctive and different look that would work well for >them. >HCB used a 50 and it was not different from what everyone else was doing at >the time.? And I bet a lot of them already were using at least 35mm lens >standing right next to him. But Few were so consistent with a very specific >focal length. Darned hard to work with if you ask me >I can wonder if he was shooting more currently if he'd be influenced by all >the other photogs shooting wide and ultrawide and their results. >I would give it another shot if you've not done it in awhile. >I get great shots with my 28 1.4 and I certainly feel enabled with it on my >camera and with a sore wrist too. When I want wider I go to a 14mm 2.8 but >feel free to crop like a son of a gun on half the shots I do with it. > > > >On 1/31/13 4:41 AM, "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote: > >> Well, we are going to have to agree to disagree here, it is simply a >> matter of >> taste (or it is in my case). Pictures of people made with lenses wider >> than >> 35m look horrible to me, and I am not that keen on 35mm either, 50 being >> my >> preference. >> I -still- think the only reason press photogs use WA lenses is to get >> everything in after they have pushed in front of everyone else, and the >> results always look poor, but are OK for news value.? >> cheers, >> FD >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2013, 8:14 >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Shanghai market part 2 >>> >>> When they say in effect if your work is weak get closer they're not >>> saying >>> crop more. They're saying? get closer. >>> I think the reason why both press and street photographers have gone wide >>> and close in their work is the rapport they have with their subjects >>> while >>> doing it. To be off shooting them from across the street is in a way >>> creepy >>> and ineffective. For decades its been a close in kind of deal. >>> >>> Don't recall you mentioning, Frank? working with lens like? an older >>> version >>> of the just announced Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-35mm F3.5-4.5G ED? which is a >>> full frame version of the 12-24 f4 DX's from a few years ago which I >>> have a >>> lot of experience with. And a more advanced updated version of the >>> venerable Leica 21mm?35mm f/3.5?f/4.0 Vario-Elmar-R zoom . >>> http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/21mm?35mm_f/3.5?f/4.0_ >>> Vario-Elmar-R >>> >>> The reason a press photog goes with a wide for a hundred years now is so >>> the >>> other cameras are not in front of him but working in the street more >>> recently its about the? other people are in the way not? so much other >>> photographers.? Street shooters like to be in the center of the action so >>> they can pic who is in the center of their fame. The dynamics are way >>> more >>> lively. Its not the crowd across the street its the guy real big in the >>> frame in the foreground and the other guys are real small and sure off to >>> the side they have watermelons for heads but we're all good with that by >>> now. >>> >>> I thought it was by the way a simple issue at day one period of the >>> Graflex >>> SLR giving way to the Speed Graphics to avoid getting the backs of other >>> photographers in the very early Part of the last century. >>> But it was also the Speed Graphics giving way to the Crown graphics which >>> were thinner with no focal plane shutter enabling the use of wider glass. >>> And that was in 1947. >>> >>> >>> On 1/31/13 2:34 AM, "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Why do you think that a longer lens is weaker? >>>> IMO the perspective distortion inevitable in WA lenses is poor for >>>> people >>>> shots, and even though the hideous technical difficulty of producing a >>>> reasonably sharp WA lens has been largely solved, they are still very >>>> expensive for what you get. >>>> I can understand a press photographer using one when there are 5 billion >>>> other >>>> photographers milling around the same subject, get in front of the >>>> others >>>> and >>>> still get everything in, but it is just that - get the news shot, not >>>> get a >>>> -good- shot. IMHO of course. >>>> >>>> If you get close in with a WA lens you are in peoples faces, which is >>>> rude >>>> (maybe its just my upbringing), and you get ugly shots. >>>> >>>> IMO the -only- reason anybody would use WA for people is the press guy >>>> needing >>>> to get the shot in crowded conditions. >>>> FD >>>> >>>> On 31 Jan, 2013, at 05:47, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Seriously it looks like you had a 50mm viewfinder in your hot shoe and >>>>> a >>>>> 24mm lens in your camera and now your fixing it. The cropped versions >>>>> are >>>>> successful images. They came out even better than I thought. >>>>> You need to stand closer to what your shooting. >>>>> A second option being shoot with a longer lens but I do feel that's way >>>>> weaker. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 1/30/13 5:08 PM, "David English" <daveenglish at icloud.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> For you who have viewed this collection before and made constructive >>>>>> comments >>>>>> I went ahead and made the suggested adjustments on many of the >>>>>> photos. I >>>>>> posted the before and after right next to each other so you can swing >>>>>> back >>>>>> and >>>>>> forth. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.davidenglishphotos.com/Travel/Shanghai-Market/27782250_3tTZjC >>>>>>>> #! >>>>>>>> i= >>>>>>>> 2342544201&k=nVw3BZv >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know what you think. >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> David >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Mark William Rabiner >>>>> Photography >>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mark William Rabiner >>> Photography >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > >-- >Mark William Rabiner >Photography >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >