Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not sure i understand your comment. But the D4 is quite good at high iso, and much better than the D800. One of the many reasons I bought the D4 instead of the D800. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:37:39 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Nikon comparison... D800E and D600 I'm sorry the D4 not D3x. On 1/22/13 12:54 AM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > A lossless compressed D800E shot is typically ~42MB (can be larger or > smaller) > compared to 36.4MB for an uncompressed M9, so not much in it. > > Genuinely curious why a D3X, better built body but otherwise a 4 year old > sensor which is not noted for high ASA exposure and still costs > significantly > more used than a D800E is new....... > > john > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> Get ready to spend regular money one hard disk upgrades these files are >> huge for full frame files. >> >> >> I'm also looking at the D3x as my next camera instead of the D800 in some >> ways for me its more of a dream camera which could come true which could >> made for me getting better shots. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information