Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Nikon comparison... D800E and D600
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:37:39 -0500

I'm sorry the D4 not D3x.


On 1/22/13 12:54 AM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> A lossless compressed D800E shot is typically ~42MB (can be larger or 
> smaller)
> compared to 36.4MB for an uncompressed M9, so not much in it.
> 
> Genuinely curious why a D3X, better built body but otherwise a 4 year old
> sensor which is not noted for high ASA exposure and still costs 
> significantly
> more used than a D800E is new.......
> 
> john
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
> 
> 
>> Get ready to spend regular money one hard disk upgrades these files are
>> huge for full frame files.
>> 
>> 
>> I'm also looking at the D3x as my next camera instead of the D800 in some
>> ways for me its more of a dream camera which could come true which could
>> made for me getting better shots.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] OT: Nikon comparison... D800E and D600)
In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] OT: Nikon comparison... D800E and D600)