Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:48 PM, David Ching <davidhhching1 at yahoo.com.sg> wrote: > Okay guys, sorry I even used the word "muddy". I was referring to the > comparison shots I have seen showing the f0.95 being rather much more > defined. So that dirty little word should not be used lest I offend owners > of the f1, which incidentally I would love to own too. (And tried too > miserably). > > As for the "glow", it is not the spherical aberration Leica kind I am > referring too. It's the Leica signature many users seek. The latest Noct's > images are cleaner yet has that look. > > So I shall remove in my limited vocabulary the words "muddy" and "glow" > from now. Even though I was using them in relative terms. > > > David Ching David, I think it's time to stop the endless blah, blah, blah about Noctilux and go take some photos. Use a lens of your choice. Steve > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information