Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Noctilux
From: davidhhching1 at yahoo.com.sg (David Ching)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:48:44 +0800
 
Okay guys, sorry I even used the word "muddy". I was referring to the 
comparison shots I have seen showing the f0.95 being rather much more 
defined. So that dirty little word should not be used lest I offend owners 
of the f1, which incidentally I would love to own too. (And tried too 
miserably). 

As for the "glow", it is not the spherical aberration Leica kind I am 
referring too. It's the Leica signature many users seek. The latest Noct's 
images are cleaner yet has that look. 

So I shall remove in my limited vocabulary the words "muddy" and "glow" from 
now. Even though I was using them in relative terms. 


David Ching
Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Noctilux)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Noctilux)