Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:07:52 -0800
References: <20121129005201.VBVL8874.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> <CAF8hL-HBaCtpeRCmP1o9AFmPRaLG=bu+W-nvurE6YM7_rhzL_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Nov 28, 2012, at 5:31 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> 
wrote:

> That is. I will use that as my excuse: I am not making a dime off my arts
> because I am in the company of Van Gogh and Atget!


sorry Richard, that excuse is already taken...


Steve


> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:52 PM, jon.streeter <jon.streeter at cox.net> 
> wrote:
> 
>> ... I would offer the observation that Van Gogh did not sell a single
>> painting, but his work, nonetheless, is highly prized.  Atget's 
>> photographs
>> were discovered after his death, if I recall correctly.
>> 
>> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)