Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:31:28 -0800
References: <20121129005201.VBVL8874.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo209>
 
That is. I will use that as my excuse: I am not making a dime off my arts
because I am in the company of Van Gogh and Atget!


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:52 PM, jon.streeter <jon.streeter at cox.net> 
wrote:

> ... I would offer the observation that Van Gogh did not sell a single
> painting, but his work, nonetheless, is highly prized.  Atget's photographs
> were discovered after his death, if I recall correctly.
>
> --
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
 In reply to: Message from jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)