Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'll stick with my current 80-200 f/2.8 AFD. Phil Forrest On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:07:51 -0600 (CST) grduprey at mchsi.com wrote: > They (Nikon) just introduced a 70 - 200 f4 which is priced at $1399. > I would think you could find the 80 - 200 R lens for far less than > $1600. > > Gene > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i at verizon.net> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2012 12:42:54 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada > Central Subject: Re: [Leica] Which Leica R tele-zoom? > > All things are relative.... > > Expensive = $5K > Economical = $1.6K > > Isn't there some Nikon lenses in the range at the same or lesser price > points? And they would offer automatic aperture operation as well.... > > And if you have an AF camera, that too..... > > It is nice to have Leica optics, but hardly a requirement.... > > Frank Filippone, repenting after his blasphemous comments...... > Red735i at verizon.net > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Vick Ko > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 8:47 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Which Leica R tele-zoom? > > The best zooms in the R line in that range are the 70-180 f2.8 Vario > APO Elmarit and 80-200 f4 Vario-Elmar lenses. > > The 70-180 is expensive but stellar > > The 80-200 is economical and stellar. > > Vick > > > On 11/3/2012 10:54 PM, Phil Forrest wrote: > > I see there are two Leica R versions of the tele-zoom in the 70-200 > > range. One is a 70-210 f/4 the other is 75-200 f/4.5. What is the > > difference between the two besides the obvious technical ones? Are > > they good performers? I notice that these are quite inexpensive > > these > days. > > > > Finally, would one of these perform better than the Nikkor 80-200 > > f/2.8 AFD? > > > > My thought is for use on a D2X. The Nikon lens offers outstanding > > performance and full metering function in all modes with the D2x. > > It's a stop faster as well. > > > > The Leica lens is a fully manual lens (I love manual focus, by the > > way so that's not a deterrent) and might have better optics but > > would limit me to stop down metering. > > > > I'm curious about your thoughts. > > Thanks all! > > > > Phil Forrest > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- http://philipforrestphoto.wordpress.com/ http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/philforrest