Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]All things are relative.... Expensive = $5K Economical = $1.6K Isn't there some Nikon lenses in the range at the same or lesser price points? And they would offer automatic aperture operation as well.... And if you have an AF camera, that too..... It is nice to have Leica optics, but hardly a requirement.... Frank Filippone, repenting after his blasphemous comments...... Red735i at verizon.net -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Vick Ko Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 8:47 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Which Leica R tele-zoom? The best zooms in the R line in that range are the 70-180 f2.8 Vario APO Elmarit and 80-200 f4 Vario-Elmar lenses. The 70-180 is expensive but stellar The 80-200 is economical and stellar. Vick On 11/3/2012 10:54 PM, Phil Forrest wrote: > I see there are two Leica R versions of the tele-zoom in the 70-200 > range. One is a 70-210 f/4 the other is 75-200 f/4.5. What is the > difference between the two besides the obvious technical ones? Are > they good performers? I notice that these are quite inexpensive these days. > > Finally, would one of these perform better than the Nikkor 80-200 > f/2.8 AFD? > > My thought is for use on a D2X. The Nikon lens offers outstanding > performance and full metering function in all modes with the D2x. It's > a stop faster as well. > > The Leica lens is a fully manual lens (I love manual focus, by the way > so that's not a deterrent) and might have better optics but would > limit me to stop down metering. > > I'm curious about your thoughts. > Thanks all! > > Phil Forrest > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information