Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Manipulation Disqualification
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:28:38 -0500
References: <CA+yJO1Ca-kuHqtG+uSHAT+tCDEcEh3fu3_Gua88Y2zMHMFJKcQ@mail.gmail.com> <4762FF92-B204-4DD0-B5B5-5A71570F9873@sfr.fr>

Discerning the difference between
 the arts of invention
And
The arts of documentation
And the art of reading rules
And knowing where in the world you are and what rules you want to work under

a note off the iPad, George

On Nov 3, 2012, at 3:35 AM, "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> 
wrote:

> A storm in a fish-bowl?
> Street photography is another kettle of fish though.
> 
> Philippe, who visited a Degas exhibition last Saturday, and is now 
> wondering if old masters' paintings should be disqualified on account of 
> their use of the camera obscura or not ...
> 
> 
> Le 3 nov. 12 ? 02:04, Tina Manley a ?crit :
> 
>> PESO:
>> 
>> I thought this was interesing:
>> 
>> http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2012/11/02/landscape-photographer-of-the-year-2012-winner-disqualified/
>> 
>> What do you think?
>> 
>> TIna
>> 
>> -- 
>> Tina Manley, ASMP
>> www.tinamanley.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Manipulation Disqualification)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Manipulation Disqualification)