Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Manipulation Disqualification
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:35:53 +0100
References: <CA+yJO1Ca-kuHqtG+uSHAT+tCDEcEh3fu3_Gua88Y2zMHMFJKcQ@mail.gmail.com>

A storm in a fish-bowl?
Street photography is another kettle of fish though.

Philippe, who visited a Degas exhibition last Saturday, and is now  
wondering if old masters' paintings should be disqualified on account  
of their use of the camera obscura or not ...


Le 3 nov. 12 ? 02:04, Tina Manley a ?crit :

> PESO:
>
> I thought this was interesing:
>
> http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2012/11/02/landscape-photographer-of-the-year-2012-winner-disqualified/
>
> What do you think?
>
> TIna
>
> -- 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Manipulation Disqualification)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Manipulation Disqualification)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Manipulation Disqualification)