Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 craps out
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:02:04 +0200
References: <16B21F66-FA90-4ACC-9B8F-A32E6F4200CC@gmail.com> <CCADBFE5.2534C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99C8F2A3D@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org>

My lowly X100 blows my M8 and my friends' M9s out of the water at ISO 3200.

Rabs likes to talk about cameras he has never used.

I still prefer my M8 images when the light is good--nobody can touch Leica 
lenses. They should just stick to optics and leave the bodies to others.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA




On Oct 24, 2012, at 10:41 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> People are waiting for a FF interchangeable lens system other than Leica, 
> it may be some time! Most people are happy with the m4/3 and X-Pro1 
> performance at high ASA and who prints at larger than A3? I cannot see a 
> flurry of FF compacts, the market is not big enough and most manufacturers 
> are too cautious unless the market looks huge. Until Fuji's recent 
> releases it was really only Sony and Panasonic pushing the boundaries.....
> 
> B&H prices:
> 
> RX1 -$2,798
> X-Pro1 + 35mm - $2,298
> 
> I know which I would choose as my main camera.....
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> In nine months when there are a half dozen competitive full frame compact 
> options turning out gorgeous files indoors and at night at iso 6400 or 
> much higher and otherwise files which will leave APS?C files in the dust 
> the Fuji
> X-100 will not seem like a very good option.
> It will be slightly cheaper.
> Actually they'll probably lower the price quite a bit.
> And  it won't be considered a serious camera.
> 
> We're in the new age now of digital Rollei 35's and it all started with 
> the Sony RX1.
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> 
> 
>> From: Lluis Ripoll Querol <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:46:12 +0200
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 craps out
>> 
>> Ric,
>> 
>> I'm very sorry to hear this, I've read some of the opinions, this is a 
>> very personal option, I agree that tat Fuji X-100 and 35mm f1.4 is a 
>> very good option, what I'm asking myself is what would do myself on 
>> this case... First at all I will continue using a Leica M with film 
>> and looking for the best solution to replace or fix the problem with 
>> your M8. I'm really used to work with Leica M and I conceive this 
>> system as my main system.
>> 
>> Good luck!
>> 
>> cheers
>> Lluis
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> El 24/10/2012, a las 2:09, Ric Carter escribi?:
>> 
>>> 24 hours into vacation on Ocracoke Island my M8 shutter crapped out
>>> 
>>> just over a year since it returned from a $400+ CLA from Leica
>>> 
>>> Looked inside and found the shutter blades piled up, one bulging 
>>> toward lens
>>> 
>>> was hoping to see an m9 price drop and maybe grab one in the next few 
>>> months, but this sure changes the timing concerns
>>> 
>>> anyone know shutter replacement cost?
>>> 
>>> suggestions?
>>> 
>>> Ric Carter
>>> www.CartersXRd.net
>>> http://www.facebook.com/ric.carter
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] M8 craps out)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] M8 craps out)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M8 craps out)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] M8 craps out)