Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:38:14 -0700
References: <20599.17411.591734.750669@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <CAJ3Pgh6oy+qWndG1-22sNW3uaKR+jeqs6YO-vmK6+K=nsrRAcQ@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E998AC030C@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CABmfTOUK7xoFwupwNg0q3G-CyV3XcocYQRwmYjuxs8mB9wS3BA@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E998AC1EB6@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <3DC41EC801A84ABCB4F1965755DC59FC@syneticfeba505> <CABmfTOWo8=WqZ6DqqubUVAe8f=x8rCKTORMXRZSJDrpycZhQSw@mail.gmail.com> <13C6AC51-95B9-4B99-8392-486639E48A2D@gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E998AC3794@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:31 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> Oh yes, my M9 went to Solms for rangefinder calibration with the lenses 
> but did not come back perfect, that was done in NZ




so Noctilux perfect at f1, and the M9 body was still OK at other Noctilux f 
stops, and with other lenses?

> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Mine went to Solms, Noctilux back-focussed ~30cm at 5m (and did not focus 
> beyond ~50m) and that and 75mm Summilux were 6-bitted. Noctilux came back 
> much better but not perfect, made perfect on M9 in NZ. Summilux came back 
> back-focussing badly, sent to Solms again and still not quite right on 
> either camera :-(
> 
> I am not sure how the Noctilux can only focus well on M9 but a 50mm 
> Summilux asph works wide open on either?
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Sorry Ted, I disagree, at least if you want photos that are in focus.
>> My M8, M9 and MM focused so far out with my Noctilux and 75 Summilux 
>> before they were properly calibrated that all my photos were just 
>> fuzz.
>> 
>> Marty
> 
> 
> hi Marty,
> 
> how (specifically) were they calibrated?  What was sent, and to where? 
> What information and requests were given and to whom?
> 
> 
> 
> thanks, Steve
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM,  <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
>>> SEE ALL THIS STUFF AND IT'S SUPPOSED TO MAKE THEM BETTER??????? :-) 
>>> Look below.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>>>> And even then there may be two or more attempts to calibrate them 
>>>>>>> :-(
>>>> 
>>>>> john
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> 
>>>>> Depending on your lenses they may need a CLA and/or calibration for 
>>>>> the digital Ms, f1.0 Noctilux and 75mm Summilux particularly...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If your fast M lenses were made before 2006 and have not been 
>>>> adjusted using the post-digital method, that "may" should read 
>>>> "must" if you want to be able to focus to the maximum accuracy the 
>>>> system is capable of attaining.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>> 
>>> 
>>> OH CRAP! :-)
>>> 
>>> Like I said ..... Click them on and shoot!  If you see something way 
>>> out of line or screwed-up quite badly indicating a real major 
>>> problem???  Then get it fixed!
>>> 
>>> Until then, it's nothing more than another money maker for Leica and 
>>> screwing us!
>>> 
>>> And yes I've used a Noctilux f 1.0 since the first one was available 
>>> in Canada around 1970 something? Or close to that. Actually I have 
>>> the first one sold in Canada, made in Canada! Dang and it still works 
>>> like a dream when I need it at f1.0! Just gotta love it! Oh and 
>>> markings??????? What were we talking about????? :-)
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> Dr. ted :-)
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
In reply to: Message from hartzell at alerce.com (George Hartzell) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] turn around time for coding lens for digital M's)