Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] So most rumours came true? GEORGE L.
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:29:21 -0700
References: <380-22012911721384701@M2W103.mail2web.com><D2F0D2001F654725A299891B4B541EC8@qck8vqhgou8blu><05D49919-3590-4C28-A322-664D724E88FC@btinternet.com><BAY160-W136EC93DC689AB76EC8E78C7940@phx.gbl><CA+3n+_nR0UZAOmeP37HLA6CMmOxnGaVd4PZh6bGrJFxbJL1mfw@mail.gmail.com><7D05D03EE4874D00AAF33C5EAF825F52@syneticfeba505> <4DE84605-31E3-404C-B31A-2BCAAEE7DD22@mac.com>

Hi George,
Thank you good Sir. :-)

I suppose much of my lack of enthusiasm about the new cameras' is;  I know 
in my heart it's not likely I'll ever have one nor shoot the assignments of 
my past with any of them. :-( If I were "working on new projects as in the 
olden Golden Days! :-)  I'd have my order in as usual... 3 M's, Black bodies 
as soon as possible and sell off the older gear as soon as the new arrived 
and get on shooting the project! Whatever it maybe with a purpose.

Part of my situation these days is, "not shooting with a purpose and an end 
result of a story or documentary."

I have had people tell me "get over it and go out and take pictures!" Like 
for what reason? Only to down load to a computer screen with the enthusiasm 
of a wet dish rag and hit delete all? That always "go out and take pictures" 
was in the learning curve of 60 years ago. And yes, we never stop learning. 
But it's the "what are the results for and purpose for shooting them?"

I suppose a hard thing for many to understand, these feelings? What is 
happening to my enthusiasm and excitment of new camera models that will 
allow one to work faster with better captured results and quality? And not 
care one way or another?

I suppose it's part of the moving on of time, age and "you've done almost 
every possible assignment there is?" I ask myself... "If I win the lottery 
big-time will I order three new "M's" and a few new lenses to replace those 
I've sold?" But as quickly I ask..... "What for?" Are they or would they 
just allow me to make a "better quality exposure without enthusiasm? Then 
delete?"

It's an interesting dilemma I'm facing and I'm not sure what the answer is? 
I don't believe new equipment would make much difference or sense. However? 
If someone said "OK we have the funding to complete your medical book 
trilogy about Sir William Osler and the medical students about the world!"

I have no doubt I'd be out the door faster than one can fly! And with new 
gear hanging off the neck and shoulders. Why? Well it would be an absolute 
purpose for taking the pictures, rather than walking about putting in 
time.... just clicking! Then delete most!" :-(

Sorry CREW, just a kind of letting it all out while admirng all these new 
neat machines!

good night,
Dr. ted :-(





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] So most rumours came true?


>
> On Sep 19, 2012, at 2:11 PM, tedgrant at shaw.ca wrote:
>
>> Your endearing thoughts most welcome. :-)
>
> Not to worry Dr. Ted - EVF w/focus peaking
> is just another way to frame the world and CLICK.
> NO MATTER if IT IS:
> ground glass with upside down image under a black cloth
> M or other range finder / view finder
> a mirror tossing the image backwards on a ground glass ala Hasselblad
> a mirror tossing the image backwards on a ground glass through a "twin 
> lens" reflex
> looking through prisms and mirrors through an SLR
> looking through an auxiliary viewfinder or even a wire sports finder frame
>
> it remains focus, aperture, shutter, frame CLICK.
> (or if a time exposure C       L       I        C        K)
>
> Now the video thing - THAT'S A WHOLE NOTHER THING ENTIRELY
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] So most rumours came true? GEORGE L.)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] So most rumours came true? GEORGE L.)
Reply from s_gregory1 at me.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] So most rumours came true? GEORGE L.)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from summarex at hotmail.com (Javier Perez) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)