Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lew You are correct, despite the sponsorship by Panasonic. Gerry Gerry Walden +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or +44 (0)797 287 7932 www.gwpics.com On 29 Jul 2012, at 14:54, Lew Schwartz wrote: > ... and I believe that I've read that they have taken the position that all > interchangeable lens cameras are, by their definitions, commercial and > evidence of commercial use. > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> > wrote: > >> I've heard several examples like that. It looks like they would be happy >> to have other people advertise for them! Makes no sense to me! >> >> Tina >> >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at me.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Piers >>> >>> My only comment would be that a school on the Isle of Wight was made to >>> remove rings of flowers made by children, and a florist in a small town >> in >>> Dorset was made to remove similar rings in the shop window put there on >> the >>> day the torch came through. Of very dubious, if any, commercial benefit >> and >>> both over the top reactions in my opinion. >>> >>> Gerry >>> >>> Gerry Walden >>> >> >> -- >> Tina Manley, ASMP >> www.tinamanley.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > -Lew Schwartz > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information