Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The death of the silver gelatin prints
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:40:42 -0700
References: <065E3CFC-378B-4BAA-BDC5-71A704AFC35A@usjet.net> <CC0762BF.294ED%bd@bdcolenphoto.com>

I can believe that. I really was hoping for at least parity. No one is more
disappointed at this than I :-(

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:24 AM, B. D. Colen <bd at bdcolenphoto.com> wrote:

> For whatever it's worth. I have an image from 1968 - shot on film and now
> scanned - that it probably the best photo I have ever made. I have made
> numerous ink jet prints of it over the years - and I am now slouch in that
> department. The prints were wonderful. But for my 65th birthday my kids
> had a double weight mat silver print of it made for me by the folks at
> Digital Silver. I made adjustments to the digital file and uploaded it to
> them. The 16x20 they produced is by far the best print I've ever had of
> this image.
>
> On 6/20/12 10:58 AM, "Robert Meier" <robertmeier at usjet.net> wrote:
>
> >Richard,
> >
> >I'm not surprised that the inkjet print looks better.   The real test
> >would be to take the same picture on film and print it on Ilford MGIV and
> >compare that print to the inkjet print.
> >
> >Robert
> >
> >On Jun 19, 2012, at 10:23 PM, Richard Man wrote:
> >
> >> Folks might remember that I tried doing digital negative before. In the
> >> end, unsuccessfully because my HP Z3100 is just not good for that
> >> particular type of task (digital negative for silver contact prints -
> >> apparently, it works great for digital negatives with alternative
> >>process).
> >> Eventually when I have to replace the Z3100, I will probably get an
> >>Epson
> >> and try the experiment again.
> >>
> >> Meanwhile, since I have to make some 17x22 prints for a couple gallery
> >> shows, I got a 8x10 sample print from Digital Silver where you upload
> >>the
> >> digital file and they print it using some sort of LED laser and then
> >> processed in wet chemical.
> >>
> >> I make the same print on the Z. Comparing to the Z3100 printing on Gloss
> >> Baryta, it's no comparison, the inkjet print looks better in every way.
> >>
> >> So Z+Gloss Baryta it is.
> >>
> >> --
> >> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] The death of the silver gelatin prints)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] The death of the silver gelatin prints)