Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I wasn't saying the M9 specifically, I am referring to the statement regarding "Leica M." e.g. an M6 is still one of the most expensive film camera around but it's "only" $1000, not $7000. If I have to sell everything else to pay for bills, I will try to keep my M7 and the Summilux 35mm. That'd be one of the last things to go, even if I have to eat ramen for a month. It's that simple. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com>wrote: > Richard, > I do not agree - using a US$5 item to justify a US$7000 item boggles the > imagination, at least mine!! > > Cheers > Jayanand > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Richard Man <richard at > richardmanphoto.com > >wrote: > > > Come on, it's like saying to people on food stamp that they shouldn't > have > > ice cream and only spend it on "important" stuff. > > > > What if there are joy of owning and using Leica, in additional to > whatever > > image quality benefits there may be. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>