Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you need that extra few thousands to survive, you probably shouldn't be shooting with a Leica M in the first place. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Phil Forrest <photo.forrest at earthlink.net>wrote: > I actually might. > The M8 is a fantastic camera. I still have a bunch of UV/IR filters. I > have an M9 and could definitely use the extra few thousand to live off > of. > > Phil Forrest > > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 11:07:32 -0400 > Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > Would you trade your M9 to go back to an M8? > > > > Factors: > > - M9 is still $5K to $6, and will start going down its devaluation > > curve > > - M8 is likely at the bottom of its devaluation curve, with mint > > units at $2.5K > > - M8 is still a darned fine camera, and I still have a whack of UV/IR > > filters > > > > Has anyone gone from M9 back to an M8? What were your reasons? > > > > Vick > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > -- > philforrest.wordpress.com > gallery.leica-users.org/v/philforrest > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >