Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:44:04 -0600
References: <3B5300DC8B914F49B9F6EF0A8F392D7E@jimnichols> <E6779EF6-CACD-4972-9E53-0158EDA409B1@frozenlight.eu>

Thanks, Nathan.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash


> Certainly without is the better image.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 11:01 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>
>> The Croci were in very poor light.  Here is a shot without the fill 
>> flash.  Perhaps, after all, it is the better image, though highlights 
>> from the sun are blown in both of the images.
>>
>> Original, with fill flash:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus85.jpg.html
>>
>> Without fill flash:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus82.jpg.html
>>
>> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash)