Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:41:32 +0100
References: <3B5300DC8B914F49B9F6EF0A8F392D7E@jimnichols>

Certainly without is the better image.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Feb 25, 2012, at 11:01 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:

> The Croci were in very poor light.  Here is a shot without the fill flash. 
>  Perhaps, after all, it is the better image, though highlights from the 
> sun are blown in both of the images.
> 
> Original, with fill flash:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus85.jpg.html
> 
> Without fill flash:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus82.jpg.html
> 
> Comments and critiques welcomed.
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash)