Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's still not as good as hacking up a Holga and making a mount for a camera using tape and glue. (Richard, speaking of Holga, how is that camera doing?) Phil Forrest On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:36:59 -0800 Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote: > Hey now Mark, people pay big bucks to use Holga lens on their Nikon > cameras: > > http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/762097-REG/Holga_779120_Lens_for_Nikon_DSLR.html > > All $24.99!!! > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Mark Rabiner > <mark at rabinergroup.com>wrote: > > > Take a look at his shot it looks like it was taken with a Holga. > > Of course your right about much of this glass not having stellar > > corner performance like cutting edge ASPH modern glass does but > > that is a far cry from the way the triplet image totally falls > > apart at the sides visible even > > in this rather low rez example. As in you're reading the words on > > those signs and they fall apart. It looks like its out of focus. > > But in the center > > its sharp. Its like an effect. > > > > -- > > Mark R. > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > > > > > > > From: Philip Forrest <photo.forrest at earthlink.net> > > > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:09:32 -0500 > > > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > > Subject: Re: [Leica] The smallest M lens > > > > > > The 50 Elmar, any 35 Summaron, and especially the 35 pre-asph > > > 'Lux are certainly not known for their corner performance at all. > > > Even the 90 Elmar is weak in the corners until it's stopped down. > > > I'm willing to wager the 35 perar holds its own against the > > > pre-asph Lux or either Summaron simply by virtue of modern design > > > but also because those old lenses are not sharp across the plane > > > until f/5.6 or even f/8. Granted, I love my Leica lenses because > > > of their aberrations but to claim that Leica can do no wrong in > > > comparison to this newcomer that is amazingly tiny then to bring > > > up the very lenses that have the aberrations you complain about > > > in the new one is just plain funny. > > > > > > Phil Forrest > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:36:17 -0500 > > > Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > > > > > >> There have always been plenty of very small footprint non > > >> descript Leica lenes which add little to the weight and bulk of > > >> an M body yet give full quality out to the edges as in the kind > > >> of quality one gets into Leica for. And I'm not even talking > > >> about the collapable Elmar a lens in chrome version my X has > > >> gotten a LOT of use out of. She also uses or used the colorable > > >> 90 elmar. But the 50 works on an M9. My 50 Summicron is light > > >> and small. My 45 Summicron C is lighter and smaller. My 35 > > >> Summicron ASPH would be even lighter and smaller if it were not > > >> the ASPH. And the summilux you can hardly tell the difference. > > >> Half the Leica glass out there tends to be tiny. The default > > >> filter size is 39. Those are my main filters for my Leica glass. > > >> I have an old tiny 35 Summaron I could use on an M with an > > >> adaptor. I got it for my LTM system I'm not sure what the cache > > >> is for this Pera 35/3.5 lens. What it opens up for the > > >> photographer that he didn't have opened up for him or her before. > > >> Mr. Miyazaki may believe that a well designed triplet exceeds a > > >> Tessar but this one gives laughable results at the edges wide > > >> open. It looks like shot through a car window at an angle. For > > >> all the big bucks and rhetoric you get a Japanese hand built > > >> Holga. And at the same price a new chrome 50 Silver Elmar went > > >> for a few years ago when we got one. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > philforrest.wordpress.com > > > gallery.leica-users.org/v/philforrest > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > > > information > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > -- philforrest.wordpress.com gallery.leica-users.org/v/philforrest