Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Help with Nocti
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:22:18 -0800
References: <935654084.10919331327340795488.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <72096D72-33BD-45BB-A280-AB1AF22BC455@panix.com> <CA+yJO1Cikb0Tizew8M5dHY1Pao9dFHPfTefYxVUUSmHtvMPB1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-F2MTEoZRn9iKy-K_GBdOK8KEyRS=TaJM_a1Nj+2ZGh9A@mail.gmail.com> <20120124054312.GC952@selenium.125px.com>

I've seen it on the 45 but usually it didn't bother me. On the 30 it often 
did, and then I used the filter. Which made it slow, and often not 
handholdable. So I might as well use a CamboWide with 6x12 back and 35 
Apo-Grandagon or 47 SA-XL. More width and more detail. Other lenses also 
available.


On 2012-01-23, at 9:43 PM, Tim Gray wrote:

> On Jan 23, 2012 at 03:23 PM -0800, Richard Man wrote:
>> It's funny, the XPan lens suppose to vignette, but I don't use the filters
>> on them and I keep having to ADD vignetting (negative priority using LR,
>> works great)...
> 
> I've seen some vignetting on the 45/4.  Not much.  But a bit.  Certainly 
> not as much as I see with the Zeiss ZM 21/4.5 (on film).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


Henning Wulff
henningw at archiphoto.com






In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Help with Nocti)