Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:10:52 -0800
References: <CAF8hL-HzJtqvN4NcSDZm3OWC4muPktx+hqXYVrm4NxFjfOeDoA@mail.gmail.com> <000801ccda5e$fa4998d0$eedcca70$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <026701ccda60$657a2100$306e6300$@earthlink.net>

I've read all sorts of rumours on price.  $1K, $2K and all the way up to 
$5K. They might well wait a bit to see how expensive it is to make as an 
actual production item.


On 2012-01-23, at 10:21 PM, Frank Filippone wrote:

> Some of the existing info on the lens ( although not for the M mount).....
> is that the cost is......
> 
> $1K.
> 
> Yes, 9% of price of the Noctilux.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at earthlink.net
> 
> I would wait for a more measured review. He has owned multiples of 50mm
> Summilux asph, f1.0 and f0.95 Noctilux but keeps selling them.....and 
> raving
> over his current lens. But it focusses to 70cm ;-)
> 
> john
> 
> Yes, the lens itself is over 34 ozs.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


Henning Wulff
henningw at archiphoto.com






Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)