Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Le 7 janv. 12 ? 09:27, Mark Rabiner a ?crit : > I got my Leica in 1993. I got my first digital a D100 in 2003. And I > got my > very first Nikon an F2 in 1972. > I thought this was a discussion about iso. Not a comparison between > M's and > F's. Exactly what I wrote Mark - the gist of digital is that you can crank up the iso and avoid camera shake blur which occurs at different settings according to the camera used. A wider ISO range is not just about stops and lens limitation, it's also about freezing it sharp. FYI and as an aside, in steady hands the L1 can remain sharp at 1/4th thanks to its laterally swinging mirror and excellent OIS but you're right this is another thread. Amiti?s Ph > But if it is a comparison between M's and F's I'm pretty aware of them > as anyone you're going to find having shot thousands of rolls with > both. And > digital makes it way different becuae you can shoot at way lower > light with > way lower shutter speeds. Don't know why. But you can. Do its hard to > compare all the way back to film. If I knew how things would be > going I'd > have never gotten my Noctilux in 2001. Things change fast. > The Sensor in the M9 just like those in the Canons and Nikon DSLR's > will be > upgraded soon enough. Its a continuous process. Things get better on > farily > regular intervals. though for some I'm sure very good reason the > sensor > development on the M9 is stuck a bit. The time will come soon enough > with > Solms announces a new sensor competitive with those in an EOS 1D > Mark IV or > D4 or 700. When that happens they'll not be paying top photographers > to use > M9's any more it will be the other way around. > > -- > Mark R. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > > >> From: Philippe Amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 08:50:14 +0100 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon D4 >> >> 2 stops is what you need to get from 1/15th to 1/60 where you get >> less >> blur with a mirror body, especially nikon BTW >> ph >> >> Le 7 janv. 12 ? 01:16, Mark Rabiner a ?crit : >> >>> But we have to be up on our logarithmics. I'm not. >>> I thought iso 64,000 was going to be a world away from 16,ooo. >>> Its only two stops! Which is tri x instead of plus x. big deal! >>> Sounded to me at first like the difference between Pan F and pushed >>> Tmax >>> 3200! >>> But it just ain't true. >>> >>> -- >>> Mark R. >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ >>> >>> >>>> From: Adam Bridge <abridge at mac.com> >>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:06:15 -0800 >>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon D4 >>>> >>>> ISO 204,000????? >>>> >>>> f8 just became a fast lens.... >>>> >>>> Adam >>>> >>>> On Jan 5, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: >>>> >>>>> Its official: >>>>> >>>>> mynikonlife.com.au/gear/digital-slr-cameras/d4 >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Jayanand >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >>>>> information >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >>>> information >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information