Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And the S2 45mm x 30mm is not that much different than other digital medium format's. Not that much smaller. Its just that its significantly bigger than 24x36. -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:20:13 +0000 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] New S lens > > I know, and that is for 56mm x 56mm rather than 45mm x 30mm > > john > ________________________________________ > > > Because on an old Hasselblad 30 is not even wide its a fisheye. > > -- > Mark R. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > >> >> 30mm S is roughly equivalent to 24mm FF >> http://www.s.leica-camera.com/leica-elmarit-s-30-mm-f-2-8-asph >> >> 35mm S > 28mm FF >> >> 70mm S > 56mm FF >> >> 120mm S > 96mm FF >> >> 180mm S > 144mm FF >> >> I think I read that it will be a zoom next and then more long lenses. >> >> All academic of course ;-) >> >> john >> ________________________________________ >> >> >> I just say that because 30 is way wider than a 70. Which makes you think >> its >> super wide. >> But 30 is so than from a 55. >> Perhaps someone can do a comparative angle of view to see how that >> compares >> to what we are familiar with in 35mm photography. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information