Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New S lens
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:20:13 +0000
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9133556DD@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>, <CACF975C.1607F%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I know, and that is for 56mm x 56mm rather than 45mm x 30mm 

john
________________________________________


Because on an old Hasselblad 30 is not even wide its a fisheye.

--
Mark R.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/



>
> 30mm S is roughly equivalent to 24mm FF
> http://www.s.leica-camera.com/leica-elmarit-s-30-mm-f-2-8-asph
>
> 35mm S > 28mm FF
>
> 70mm S > 56mm FF
>
> 120mm S > 96mm FF
>
> 180mm S > 144mm FF
>
> I think I read that it will be a zoom next and then more long lenses.
>
> All academic of course ;-)
>
> john
> ________________________________________
>
>
> I just say that because 30 is way wider than a 70. Which makes you think 
> its
> super wide.
> But 30 is so than from a 55.
> Perhaps someone can do a comparative angle of view to see how that compares
> to what we are familiar with in 35mm photography.
>


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] New S lens)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New S lens)
In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] New S lens)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New S lens)