Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I know, and that is for 56mm x 56mm rather than 45mm x 30mm john ________________________________________ Because on an old Hasselblad 30 is not even wide its a fisheye. -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > 30mm S is roughly equivalent to 24mm FF > http://www.s.leica-camera.com/leica-elmarit-s-30-mm-f-2-8-asph > > 35mm S > 28mm FF > > 70mm S > 56mm FF > > 120mm S > 96mm FF > > 180mm S > 144mm FF > > I think I read that it will be a zoom next and then more long lenses. > > All academic of course ;-) > > john > ________________________________________ > > > I just say that because 30 is way wider than a 70. Which makes you think > its > super wide. > But 30 is so than from a 55. > Perhaps someone can do a comparative angle of view to see how that compares > to what we are familiar with in 35mm photography. >