Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Dave, You are absolutely correct. For folks like me, it is a completely impractical expense. I'm having a terrific time! :-) Best, Bob Bob Adler Palo Alto, CA http://www.rgaphoto.com ________________________________ From: David Rodgers <drodgers at casefarms.com> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Thu, July 7, 2011 6:47:45 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Medium Format Digital I look at MF Digital with bridled enthusiasm. It fascinates me, but it's not something I need, or even desire. I've made large prints from Micro Four Thirds, not to mention APS-C and FX. A vast majority of my images stay digital, meaning they're viewed digitally. In the digital arena it's rare that I can tell what format was used for a photo, unless the caption tells me. In the days of film I had 4x5, MF and 35mm. I still used 35mm most of the time. Yet the cost of shooting larger format then was nothing compared to what it is in the digital world. MF digital intrigues me, but it's not practical for anything I do. Dave Message----- From: lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Jayanand Govindaraj Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 11:35 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: [Leica] Medium Format Digital http://www.photosafaris.com/blog/2011/why-medium-format-rules-by-james-m artin/ Cheers Jayanand _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information