Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why use a 90....another crop
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:24:47 +0200
References: <0EB1272F-C009-4F32-A8F6-C268D56B479D@mac.com> <DD4F6116-7B3A-4CEC-A087-B055FB2033FB@sfr.fr> <07A88083-4E7B-4676-BFEF-C324CA1A39F9@mac.com>
 
yup, way better now,
still sharp :-)
ph

Le 4 juil. 11 ? 15:17, Kenneth Frazier a ?crit :

>
>
> On Jul 4, 2011, at 8:15 AM, philippe.amard wrote:
>
>> Better with it IMHO, looks so unbalanced now
>> Ph
>
>
> Here's another crop of the image. a bit larger for detail:
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/mickey2.jpg.html
>
> What say you?
>
> I was focusing on the eyes (or eyeglass rims at that distance).
>
> Ken
>
> --------------------------
> Kenneth Frazier
> kennybod at me.com
> kennybod at mac.com
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Why use a 90....another crop)
 In reply to: Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Why use a 90....link to crop fixed)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Why use a 90....link to crop fixed)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Why use a 90....another crop)