Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/07/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why use a 90....another crop
From: kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier)
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:17:44 -0400
References: <0EB1272F-C009-4F32-A8F6-C268D56B479D@mac.com> <DD4F6116-7B3A-4CEC-A087-B055FB2033FB@sfr.fr>
On Jul 4, 2011, at 8:15 AM, philippe.amard wrote:
> Better with it IMHO, looks so unbalanced now
> Ph
Here's another crop of the image. a bit larger for detail:
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/mickey2.jpg.html
What say you?
I was focusing on the eyes (or eyeglass rims at that distance).
Ken
--------------------------
Kenneth Frazier
kennybod at me.com
kennybod at mac.com
Replies:
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Why use a 90....another crop)
In reply to:
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Why use a 90....link to crop fixed)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Why use a 90....link to crop fixed)