Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The MACBA & El Raval NOW FILM????
From: michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:23:01 +0100
References: <3B28AE49-4AE9-42DF-8D17-8D76F949B303@gmail.com> <5F4F775B-2AF9-4027-835B-48F18CCEEBA7@frozenlight.eu> <7EB7005115C44B1CB78D935AEA570438@syneticfeba505> <AANLkTiktOOsUZDyZ3c1krXPEFhpPtOuDAFhkaU75nZ6z@mail.gmail.com>

I totally agree with you Lluis.
For me film just looks much better. It also  has much more dynamic range.
I always felt it is very strange to use software to make digital files 
look like film. Just use the original thing and your done right away. 
That's what I call KISS.
The new Kodak Portra makes it even better. Best film ever  made and the 
good thing is I dont have to buy a new camera to use the latest film 
technology.

Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema

On 8-3-2011 17:10, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
> Hi Ted and Nathan, mes amis
>
> Maybe I was too enthousiast saying "film is better" instead of "I like
> better B&W on film". IMO there are two things that film gives better than
> digital, at least for my experience. The blacks are more deepth, more 
> dense,
> no noise in the shadows or lower light areas, the higlights are not 
> blocked.
> Maybe I don't have enough skills on digital, but I'm much more fast editing
> at PS a B&W picture from film than converting it from digital color to B&W.
>
> It was a while I've not used film, after 2 or 3 months I'm using Silver 
> Efex
> Pro, yes this is fine and I can get better results and approach much better
> the film, but in general I find that film give me better results according
> to my preferences.
>
> You say that actually you think in color, and this is arriving to me too,
> digital color is so nice and immediate that it becomes difficult think on
> B&W or maybe do a conversion that it satisfy you better than the color
> version. Probably this is too influenced by a psichological "effect", you
> immediately see a color digital picture and can do also immediately the
> conversion; with film this arrives after some hours or days and you have
> already forgett the natural colors of the scene, than when you scann and
> see, I say "oh! is beautiful!".
>
> I hope I have give a response to your questions, maybe wrong..., but
> according to my experience and skills on digital. I don't know if the 
> sensor
> of a M9 is better corrected for the things I've commented. I think that it
> should be a special firmware or sensor to do directly B&W... I don't think
> that B&W could be defined as simply "substract the color", the original
> invention was different.
>
> This is my opinion....., my 2 cents ...
>
> I don't think I can write today more comments about this subject, now I'm 
> on
> the office and I go to the Opera House in one hour.
>
> Thanks for your questions!
>
> cheers
> Lluis
>
>
>
> 2011/3/8<tedgrant at shaw.ca>
>
>> Lluis Ripoll  said:
>>
>>> M7, Elmarit 28mm Asph, Plus X..... Film is better!<<<<
>>>>>
>>>>
>> Nathan Offered:
>>
>>>> Very nice, Lluis, especially the 2nd and last one. I don't know if film
>>>>> is better, it is just different.<<<<
>>>>
>>>
>> Hi both, :-)
>>
>> Lluis and Nathan a couple of questions?
>>
>> 1/ Why do you say "Film is better?"
>>
>> 2/ "Where do you think film is better?"
>>
>> Since I became "Hooked on digital," it has never occurred to me to ever go
>> back to film..... "OF ANY KIND!" Or even think about it. And don't miss it
>> for one milli-second!
>>
>> I shoot nothing but digital with various cameras and I still expose the
>> neat things I did with film. Actually, I think in colour "digital colour 
>> is
>> immediate, result is right there in a moment!" No need to or rarely need 
>> to
>> bracket frame after frame as we did with film. Nor do I have to take it to
>> the lab, wait for the developing a couple of hours? Days? Weeks? Depending
>> which film I was using?
>>
>> And as I understand from Tina and others, today there is software? I think
>> that's what it is? You can make digital images look like they were shot on
>> film. But being me, my response is always "WHY? AND WHO CARES?" Certainly 
>> if
>> the content is a smashing great content! After all isn't it the content 
>> that
>> matters most and not whether the image looks like Tri-x, Kodachrome or
>> whatever?Just a couple of early morning thoughts and questions.
>> cheers,
>> ted
>>
>> ================================================
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Wajsman"<photo at 
>> frozenlight.eu>
>> To: "Leica Users Group"<lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] The MACBA&  El Raval
>>
>>
>>   Very nice, Lluis, especially the 2nd and last one. I don't know if film 
>> is
>>> better, it is just different.
>>>
>>> Saludos,
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>> Alicante, Spain
>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>>
>>> YNWA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 5, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
>>>
>>>   The MACBA is the Museum of art contemporary in Barcelona
>>>>
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/El_Raval/2011020228w.jpg.html
>>>>
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/El_Raval/2011020227w.jpg.html
>>>>
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/El_Raval/2011020216w.jpg.html
>>>>
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/El_Raval/2011020210w.jpg.html
>>>>
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/El_Raval/2011020208w.jpg.html
>>>>
>>>> M7, Elmarit 28mm Asph, Plus X..... Film is better!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for looking, your c&c are welcome
>>>>
>>>> Saludos
>>>> Lluis
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
>>>> http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
>>>> Blog:
>>>> http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
-------------------------------------------
Michiel Fokkema
www.michielfokkema.com
+31 (0) 615569576


Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] The MACBA & El Raval NOW FILM????)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] The MACBA & El Raval)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] The MACBA & El Raval)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] The MACBA & El Raval NOW FILM????)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] The MACBA & El Raval NOW FILM????)