Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] S2 success (or lack thereof)
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:27:05 -0500

Yes but without the be its a regular working man's camera.
No frills.
No special finishes.
Just brilliant engendering design.
A bunch of people will be pulling double shifts to pull one off.


--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
mark at rabinergroup.com
Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb




> From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:11:29 +1300
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] S2 success (or lack thereof)
> 
> Isn't the P in S2-P for "preciousss"?
> 
> john - LOTR land 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> The S2 is very much a working camera. They will not exist in collectors
>> glass cases.
>> They are not precious.
>> 
>> 
>> "He wants the precious. Always he is looking for it. And the precious
>> is wanting to go back to him... But we mustn't let him have it."
>> 
>> Myyy PRECIOUSSS.
>> --------------------
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] S2 success (or lack thereof))