Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The reason it is so hard for photographers to make a living is that people give their photos away for free!!! Tina On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin at gmail.com>wrote: > Tina writes: > > "You are right, Peter. I was there telling you not to give your photos > away > > for nothing. How do you know it had no commercial value? I sell photos > > every day that would be considered throwaway home happy snaps. If you give > > them away for nothing, you will never know if you could have sold them and > > you diminish the value of all photography by giving your creative work > > away.. Credit is worth demanding but only if it is accompanied by actual > > money!! > > > I'll get off my soapbox now, but I hope no one ever gives their photos away > > for only a credit :-(" > > > Tina, I fully agree with your position but you are not describing the world > as it is. It is harder to make a decent living as an independent > professional photographer than it is as an actor or even a poet. > Considering > the number of professional quality cameras out there, only the tiniest > fraction deliver pictures that are ever published. Given the quality > standards imposed by stock agencies, vanishingly few P&S pictures will ever > make the grade regardless of merit unless of a particularly newsworthy > event. > > > > I serve as an art critic for several newspapers in the art rich northeast > and visit dozens of art and photography shows annually. Far fewer than 10% > of the artworks and photos exhibited sell. Those that do depict a narrow > range of subjects, usually locally defined. Animals, children and nostalgia > sell. Marine scenes sell along the Atlantic coast, western and frontier > scenes in Texas, and faux Hudson River art in the Hudson Valley. But few > portraits, or historical event pictures. Bright colors sell, muted grays > don't. And forget about B&W unless your last name is Adams or Weston. To > sell artworks, you must forget about your internal muse and conform to the > desires of your audience. The virtue of a site like the LUG is that there > are no jurors who filter the content. Many of the pictures are truly > excellent but would be hard pressed to find a commercial outlet. But on the > LUG they don't have to. > > > So if a photographer is offered an opportunity to have his/her pictures > published in a national forum, grab at the chance. Even if there is no > payment. It may be the only way to get recognition in an overcrowded > field. Isn't that why we produce the LUG yearbook? > > > Perhaps it is harder to make a living as a poet than as a photographer. But > not much. > > > Larry Z > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com