Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)')
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:47:29 -0800
References: <C8FD7E98.6320%mark@rabinergroup.com> <529686F3EB724B03A0DEBEF92EFE19E1@syneticfeba505> <412B27BA635543079FFE29F57C2BAC41@jimnichols> <6DDD4824-819A-484A-B775-3F23BF9F399A@mac.com> <D7CBF09A9F0E4BF393A22D3332E8899A@syneticfeba505> <1BADB35D-2D19-4B55-9219-D6B70A21F839@mac.com>

I'm sure George you understand what I meant here. Obviously those like 
yourself who have mastered the strobes of the studio it is an entirely 
different manner.

My meaning, maybe not quite clarified properly relates to the "flash on 
camera if not what they think is enough light for an exposure they just 
blast a light flash sufficient for exposure. Mood lighting effect? Not a 
tinker's damn! Just blasted light.
Idiots can do that extremely easy.

A studio master like yourself? Well that's a whole different ballgame of 
talent and understanding how to use light and to create it effectively.
I trust no offence was made by my earlier comment.
cheers,
ted
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)')


> We part ways a bit here.
> I consider strobes a blessing
> and use them when appropriate
> to achieve the desired result.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:31 PM, tedgrant at shaw.ca wrote:
>
>> " Without the horrid FLASH APPARATUS!" :-) ;-)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))