Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Nov 07, 2010 at 09:43 AM +1030, Marty Deveney wrote: > The 90 APO is very impressive, but at portrait distances it is less > impressive than further away - the absence of a floating element > starts to show and there is noticeable curvature of field. This was > the motivation for the design used in the 75 Summicron, which focuses > to 0.75 m and gets you a tighter crop, and is the M lens I'd recommend > if you'd like a very modern rendering lens for portraits. The 75 Summicron is too close for me to my 50 ASPH. And too expensive. I'd never be able to figure out which one I wanted to use at the moment. While 80 is close to 75, 1.4 is faster than 2 (useful at times) and I would imagine 80/1.4 is easier to focus on an SLR than is the 75 Summilux on M (which is also too expensive for me). One other thing I hadn't mentioned. I would imagine my girlfriend will be using this a bit if I get it. And she doesn't get along with rangefinders at all. I think she takes good pictures with them, but she much prefers using SLRs. Go figure. > I kept the Nikkor but returned the test sample 80 Summilux because I > like the F3 better than any of the R cameras and I already have a > bunch of other Nikon SLR lenses. Very nice pictures. Thanks for sharing those.