Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Sentience
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:53:39 +0100
References: <28453325.1288804016846.JavaMail.root@mswamui-thinleaf.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <710E6085-8ACA-4AD8-B67F-503260E7B9C6@mac.com>

http://channel.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=27283
and
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11666162

:-)

Philippe

Le 3 nov. 10 ? 19:35, George Lottermoser a ?crit :

>
> I've already acknowledged
> that I like the design and compositional elements.
>
> "if this were a charcoal drawing"
> I may (or may not) be enjoying the artistry of the drawing.
>
> Drawings depend on the work of the hands in coordination with the  
> eyes.
> 'tis that which makes them beautiful (when successful).
> Which is why I asked about (and indirectly suggested) the wacom  
> tablet.
>
> Photoshop filters don't instantly turn digital photo files into  
> charcoal drawings (not even close).
> (even when the filter's labeled "charcoal").
> It requires knowing what a charcoal drawing actually looks like.
> Then working the photograph far enough to move away from the  
> aesthetics of a photograph
> and towards the aesthetics of a charcoal drawing.
>
> The problem (for me) is that the filter effect has taken over the  
> aesthetics in your example.
> The image "looks like" it's attempting to "be" something other than  
> a photograph;
> yet does not reach that goal.
> An actual charcoal drawing does not attempt to "look like" a  
> charcoal drawing.
>
> This tutorial appears to achieve the goal may you may be attempting  
> to achieve:
> <http://www.dphotojournal.com/charcoal-drawing-with-photoshop/>
> Not sure it succeeds either because the images are so small.
>
> YMMV
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Montie Talbert wrote:
>
>> Step back for a moment, what would you think if this were a
>> charcoal drawing and not a photograph??  Be as objective as
>> possible!
>>
>> Montie
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>
>>> Sent: Nov 3, 2010 12:47 PM
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Sentience
>>>
>>> and I'm not aware of
>>> any "return tiny section to medium format quality" PS filters
>>> (yet).
>>>
>>> ;~)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george at imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Montie Talbert wrote:
>>>
>>>> The comp and light play were there...quality was not;  ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
NO ARCHIVE




Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Sentience)
In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie Talbert) ([Leica] IMG: Sentience)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Sentience)