Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, Jim - It does work! I use the Kodachrome calibration slide with Silverfast for scanning KC and get better results than with any other scanning software. However, I do not use the SRD dust removal. Like all other dust removal software, it does degrade the image, very, very slightly. It's only noticeable if you examine the edges at 100%, but that's what I have to do to submit stock photos. Silverfast's dust removeable does a better job on KC and B&W than Digital ICE, but it's not perfect. If I'm only going to scan everything one time, I prefer to remove the dust in PS than take a chance on any artifacts - even if they're only apparant at 100%. Tina On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com> wrote: > Tim, > > >From the B&H website for LaserSoft Imaging SilverFast Ai 6.6 Scanner > Software: > > Kodachrome > > Kodachrome Scans without Bluecast, Dust and Scratches with SilverFast > By implementing improved Kodachrome routines into SilverFast > Version 6.6 it's finally possible to achieve high quality scans of > Kodachrome slides with the highest possible dynamic range: color > calibrated and free of bluecast, dust, and scratches > > Kodachrome ICC Profiles & Scanner Calibration > Anyone working with Kodachrome scans without properly adjusting > the scanner to the special film material knows the problem of the > nasty bluecast. Some scanner manufacturer's software may have a > Kodachrome mode for selection, which usually isn't very helpful, > because a device specific calibration is lacking. It needs a color > calibration with a Kodachrome target to avoid the bluecast problem > completely. Unfortunately Kodak has stopped producing Kodachrome Q60 > targets in 1999. > > Therefore we have implemented generic Kodachrome ICC-profiles for > many supported film scanners in SilverFast 6.6. This is a good > starting basis. For really true color results it needs a scanner > calibration. For this purpose LaserSoft Imaging offers special > Kodachrome targets > > Kodachromes with Maximum Dynamic Range > It is a considerable challenge to scan a Kodachrome slide without > sacrificing some of the film's inherent dynamic range. This is because > Kodachrome's dynamic range reaches up to 3.8D - which is a grayscale > range of 6300 shades and equals a contrast range of 1:6300! > > Fortunately SilverFast Multi-Exposure can handle the enormous > dynamic range with film scanners. This assures reproducing the deepest > shades inside Kodachromes successfully > > Kodachromes without Dust and Scratches - SRD and iSRD > Because its film material is very different than normal color > films, ordinary dust and scratch removal tools (like ICE) fail with > Kodachromes. SilverFast uses a combination of advanced dust and > scratch removal functions, SRD and iSRD, on several layers and masks > in order to guarantee dust and scratch free Kodachrome scans > > >> snip > > By utilization of iSRD & SRD and several layers & masks it is even > possible to remove dust and scratches from very challenging film > material like Kodachrome or B/W-film reliably. This isn't achievable > with similar systems from other manufacturers > > Sounds good if it works. Tina? > > Jim > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> wrote: > > On May 11, 2010 at 09:39 AM -0500, James Laird wrote: > >> > >> What would scare me away would the support issue. Film scanner are > >> getting to be like Kodachrome, a thing of the past. Who know how long > >> Silverfast will be around. And will they keep updating it for the > >> latest OS? > > > > They seem to update their software pretty frequently. They officially > > support OS X 10.6 for the Nikons for example, which is better than can be > > said for Nikon itself. > > > > By the way, if I were hypothetically interested in Silverfast, which > version > > do people suggest? That's the other thing that is off putting to me. 6 > > different versions with obtuse nomenclature. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com