Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]was the sample you posted wide open? have you tried it at other f stops? just curious. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, James Laird wrote: > George, > > I see what you mean. I thought it was moderately good bokeh when I > first took it. But as you say it's all subjective. Oh well, I only > paid 49 bucks for it. Maybe I can get a Leica R 200 some day for that > price (in my dreams;) > > Jim Laird > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:53 AM, George Lottermoser > <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: >> obviously subjective >> but I find the bokeh >> quite disturbing >> reminds me of the glass >> used in some bathroom windows. >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:12 AM, James Laird wrote: >> >>> Trying out my 'new' Nikkor 200 f4 on my GH1 I took this: >>> >>> >>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/digiratidoc/GH1/Nikkor-200f4- >>> Bokeh.jpg.html> >>> >>> Now I think this is great bokeh. Agree? >>> >>> Jim Laird >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information